From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B552D3858D35; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:41:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B552D3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688049696;
	bh=hdO0VMb30s4Ss3nBfeBIzfdYPScnQndYUYIvD5doQHg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=La/LVG0ilthvZ5NzvWIMv5Ytu+uB8L3dspicoQhINknSo7pk1ehAM/NALGxKEz//9
	 rBBz5DtOuLyXrKU5ianB1//3byPkhViu5+jS3QLLoXzTn6EU8HaEAkRcCxhw/QNKjc
	 JAkUHBR7qNwRa5tZLz7efFLoGOtPkuRBLJfFMFcE=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/110077] [14 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check FAILs
 on Solaris
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 14:41:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110077-4-sWmzve6mxf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110077-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110077

--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> One solution would be to just add the declaration to the header, and adju=
st
> the exports so this new symbol is exported at GLIBCXX_3.4.32 not
> GLIBCXX_3.4.31

N.B. this is what we do for glibc-based linux targets. The symbol is presen=
t in
the library even when glibc doesn't provide strtof128. This means that we d=
on't
have a different set of exported symbols when built on old or new glibc.

If Solaris is ever going to get support for strtof128 and other _Float128
support then that is probably what we should do here as well.=