From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 91E653858D37; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:55:23 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 91E653858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1688043323; bh=OLOxKljTyfkHkJVa+v64EmBUX+abBB1CtI5p3rsZznY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M55995Ssf3hQFurt91qvcG1q+KEVhw1WjoUE39hekrkHkJsIL+FV4tK2hdaU7DbSa Wlv6OjOW3JPdXN9c3kHMjcll80TDYuP5A9y4byrNgGEIbBcqjRATEGkkKIlaY/G3iG GDE5Pz27njsPVBG4qsS8oLWHCtDTWnHXEXtn+NUc= From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/110077] [14 regression] libstdc++-abi/abi_check FAILs on Solaris Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:55:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110077 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > This is going to be hard for me to figure out without access to a Solaris > x86 system. There's hope that at least one, maybe two, Solaris 11.4/x86 systems can be added to the cfarm. As always, the primary problem is politics... > Could you please attach the output of this command using GCC trunk on > solaris x86? >=20 > g++ -std=3Dc++23 -include charconv -x c++ /dev/null -E -dD Sure, done.=