From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C4B293858C29; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:13:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C4B293858C29 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1705068824; bh=HkXR46NPCiAUv7F/RQSD6DCF1t5fA8Kf3EibdBbKqWU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=W8qAUs780Br1+ztea3XqN/CBWOFuqHvLQXgLT3I5VPpOj18xXjlwJ9IWZsR75Hw9p uwdHfXIpo7tbYwYpFFgZtAzTEY0eAiOJEANZHC6PxX9qksguzQoreKuQn9bDaGCHIx xZ72awHjcaK4qmF3IMlOs18F+iyBhuHNpGvd87GA= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110091] [12/13/14 Regression] bogus -Wdangling-pointer on non-pointer values Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:13:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110091 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P2 CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, | |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Honza? Why do we consider to split before anotherfunc(5)? It's an odd place since we'll always arrive there from the point we insert the call? The only other sensible point would have been before if (out), thus BB4?=