From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DC4973858C62; Fri,  2 Jun 2023 22:28:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DC4973858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685744902;
	bh=uqF+qbqaKOIFpqdfAy2ZfrY3UCXbfwp/ppZnio2XwTM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=b45+w5ko2OTIiMXlKqEyGCQEV6xbJz+WDkcaNNR1uwECXaJJbnOFJYoI0gsi2XE70
	 hrdmYqaMFUU/qEfTOWQ3Y3H/pGcnqRsZ4ATllUKBOnZ0qEYTVxQAxYk5GFZ/o3qagw
	 c32HTVWr5lQrc2gW+nBLWP9k+HLX3/YPYdlDf30I=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110100] __builtin_aarch64_st64b stores to the wrong
 address
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 22:28:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords everconfirmed
 cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-110100-4-r7CQHMWt6R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110100-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110100-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110100

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-06-02

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed, you can get the similar wrong code with just:
#include <arm_acle.h>
void do_st64b(int *a, data512_t data) {
    __arm_st64b((void*)(a+512), data);
}=