From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ADBE13858C1F; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:22:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ADBE13858C1F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686734573;
	bh=7+1s9vMt09j9u6cJLfXHYjMcX0la8EeRYdxs92XC4dY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=w7Q2BDYAY9tWY+Ux281newZakKA9sRG1/qievDClrE703YREmUOrJRG39s+wysa7b
	 kB+IXR5ICHfJGygiV4uC4XO616vaaagtnoYFhdo2vUgK9s01aa8Z9gqnNdLVkzFvm8
	 tamtnTmKXlhBB749EcntQDKYsECVF29mWjSmJUR0=
From: "slash.tmp at free dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110104] gcc produces sub-optimal code for _addcarry_u64
 chain
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 09:22:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: slash.tmp at free dot fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110104-4-RXgPuT1xM6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110104-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110104-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110104

--- Comment #2 from Mason <slash.tmp at free dot fr> ---
You meant PR79173 ;)

Latest update:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/621554.html

I didn't see my testcase specifically in Jakub's patch,
but I'll test trunk on godbolt when/if the patch lands.=