[Bug c/110154] New: When compiling __builtin_frame_address with a relatively large argument, GCC-trunk takes up a significant amount of time.

[Bug c/110154] New: When compiling __builtin_frame_address with a relatively large argument, GCC-trunk takes up a significant amount of time.

[141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110154

            Bug ID: 110154
           Summary: When compiling __builtin_frame_address with a
                    relatively large argument, GCC-trunk takes up a
                    significant amount of time.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn
  Target Milestone: ---

This behavior can be verified on https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/7967MTMrP

When compile below program with gcc:
```
void *h() {
  return __builtin_frame_address(0xFFFFF);
}
```


gcc takes over 40 seconds to finish:
```
$ time gcc-14 -c -O2 a.c
gcc-14 -c -O2 a.c  43.33s user 1.04s system 99% cpu 44.381 total
```

in contrast, clang immediately returns:
```
$ clang-17 -c -O2 a.c
<source>:2:10: error: argument value 1048575 is outside the valid range [0,
65535]
    2 |   return __builtin_frame_address(0xFFFFF);
      |          ^                       ~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
```

[Bug c/110154] When compiling __builtin_frame_address with a relatively large argument, GCC-trunk takes up a significant amount of time.

[141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110154

wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> ---
not a bug