public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/110171] New: [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression
@ 2023-06-08 13:21 lukaslang.bugtracker at outlook dot com
  2024-07-16 15:08 ` [Bug c++/110171] " arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lukaslang.bugtracker at outlook dot com @ 2023-06-08 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110171

            Bug ID: 110171
           Summary: [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding
                    result of co_await expression
           Product: gcc
           Version: 11.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: lukaslang.bugtracker at outlook dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

(Note: The example & bug is very similar to this here:
https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/nodiscard-not-honored-by-co_await/1500944)

It seems that discarding the `co_await`ed result of an awaitable with
`[[nodiscard]]` `await_resume` doesn't lead to the expected warning
([Godbolt](https://godbolt.org/z/o47EdzMj8)):

```
#include <coroutine>

struct must_check_result
{
    bool await_ready() { return false; }
    void await_suspend(std::coroutine_handle<>) {}
    [[nodiscard]] bool await_resume() { return {}; }
};

struct task {};

namespace std
{
    template<typename... Args>
    struct coroutine_traits<task, Args...>
    {
        struct promise_type
        {
            task get_return_object() { return {}; }
            suspend_always initial_suspend() noexcept { return {}; }
            suspend_always final_suspend() noexcept { return {}; }
            void return_void() {}
            void unhandled_exception() {}
        };
    };
}

task example()
{
    co_await must_check_result(); // no warning even though await_ready is
marked [[nodiscard]]
    must_check_result().await_resume();
}
```

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/110171] [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression
  2023-06-08 13:21 [Bug c++/110171] New: [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression lukaslang.bugtracker at outlook dot com
@ 2024-07-16 15:08 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-07-22 12:17 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-07-25 20:12 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-16 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110171

Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |diagnostic
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-07-16

--- Comment #1 from Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
confirmed - likely because we explicitly discard the result in this case:

          resume.4:;
          <<cleanup_point <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt
            (void) must_check_result::await_resume (&Aw0) >>>>>;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/110171] [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression
  2023-06-08 13:21 [Bug c++/110171] New: [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression lukaslang.bugtracker at outlook dot com
  2024-07-16 15:08 ` [Bug c++/110171] " arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-07-22 12:17 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-07-25 20:12 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-22 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110171

--- Comment #2 from Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
no - it is because convert_to_void does not know how to warn about discarded
co_awaits, and it does not get re-invoked when we expand co_awaits

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/110171] [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression
  2023-06-08 13:21 [Bug c++/110171] New: [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression lukaslang.bugtracker at outlook dot com
  2024-07-16 15:08 ` [Bug c++/110171] " arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-07-22 12:17 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-07-25 20:12 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-25 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110171

Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Arsen Arsenović <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-25 20:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-08 13:21 [Bug c++/110171] New: [[nodiscard]] of await_resume ignored when discarding result of co_await expression lukaslang.bugtracker at outlook dot com
2024-07-16 15:08 ` [Bug c++/110171] " arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-07-22 12:17 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-07-25 20:12 ` arsen at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).