From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 46FD83858404; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:37:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 46FD83858404 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1704706655; bh=gEKiBUdhM5Achd4YcQjfqTyT1eNbZIjqrJ7ePyQpinY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=T8WzA8jC/IlSO3fEx6UCO3SgjlprP+QvY/FfCZrQHG4rEk1xGsMCfV7goECqmzdKr zdqvEGGOD3VYXuT4s0CIO/meFBCL9k1N6mTcXMCIm+GmItq17yY7gjUQ9lAPJT67dC cRqLgrCliIclmwIIIvde4vy5hiQmABOlGnJplBlQ= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110176] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r11-2446 Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 09:37:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110176 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot = gnu.org --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- comment#4 suggests the iteration order change just exposes the issue highlighted in comment#1? I will eventually investigate.=