From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7F1363858D3C; Fri, 9 Jun 2023 22:28:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7F1363858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1686349693; bh=SPYWgRKzkJFHP2FL73DEEvJ+umYDAIJJTI1k+EpNcJ0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=P2szBW6+T4//tJHKvwq5CNNRHvxa96remS1fvtPs3gL5rYly7zwjz/WALVqsg5HPf ULiWzV/ZwDAGzRtukpUkX0Dqm8VjVQhbMi5PC02X6Czh6qu2A31Dtir7vt1iApErME XvDZrqDylF3X0daY1rEbO0+2DfyeWevgAnwg2UJw= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110199] New: [12/13/14 Regression] Missing VRP transformation with MIN_EXPR and known relation Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 22:28:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110199 Bug ID: 110199 Summary: [12/13/14 Regression] Missing VRP transformation with MIN_EXPR and known relation Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Take: ``` int test(int a, int b) { if (a <=3D b) return a < b ? a : b; return 0; } ``` This used to be optimized in GCC 11 and before via EVRP: pushing new range for b_3(D): int [a_2(D), +INF] EQUIVALENCES: { b_3(D) } = (1 elements) evrp visiting stmt _5 =3D MIN_EXPR ; extract_range_from_stmt visiting: _5 =3D MIN_EXPR ; Intersecting int VARYING and int VARYING to int VARYING Folding statement: _5 =3D MIN_EXPR ; Folded into: _5 =3D a_2(D); But in GCC 12 and above it is missed: Folding statement: _5 =3D MIN_EXPR ; folding with relation a_2(D) <=3D b_3(D) Not folded=