From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 53E383858D32; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:10:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 53E383858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686615044;
	bh=uM+R3FCKq0P5wSu4TI2z4nxzOqTdzADEcKnbIYjZaGA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aUD3mN+s9w5IC7glcP1APsvtZ/SIudvNkpvMYq9AX7y2o947YFnYZJW49L2YM54gT
	 lkDMCGP3JQrPHCI3S9LzgaLdtdrGQfsLlwL9hFyz+/Uz3W/P6pnmkFem92vt72WU4e
	 oIwLl4a6MKRLZRl9o35JH9bBg5rPUbEvJn6fqSTs=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110216] tuple_size requirements for structured binding has
 not been updated after DR 2386
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 00:10:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-110216-4-BOrcJz8AQO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110216-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110216-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110216

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-dr-status.html
>=20
> listed as ? there.

Updated to say "No".=