From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ED1CE3858D39; Sat, 17 Jun 2023 16:53:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED1CE3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687020798;
	bh=swcVaDNsVSS8ikz3IHxUyOnSFnGpgbQWXTYF5Mv9ksg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KeXigM3LYm5dt/n6V3YJwsHOBrt0ocjmx0bLf8DwvyOi0Lc7AVaDqyfWPY3WyhUOy
	 V2Tzn2x0kMMWQtmBcP2iZLA0gwkbczNrVkhKb7abM++gdYyJgXZq8ctYe7NrSdeFqh
	 eiTZOsPeCR0M9o90WethLdN4jypklUHkq47IQa/I=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/110224] Rejects valid: function reference with data
 pointer result as lhs in assignment
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 16:53:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked
Message-ID: <bug-110224-4-ha3U9ZieBZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110224-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110224-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110224

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |87477

--- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OK - I'm onto it :-)

Paul


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D87477
[Bug 87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement=