From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8E93E3858004; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:36:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E93E3858004 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1687279016; bh=Dt/xh6ijhmvfBvlHTo8ruczjhQN+Skg571F9Mw8iVqE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BGiksv/0AKClJzwj4OK/C7pIdTvXRxzGfd63unuVWUMUY48B6tOo173QtkaVZhmdJ LHE6gsLeirS51j8F2I1erYYPEzlKT3/xtRSXkf6rKxTFWjrbL6mk7di6NgflT5eDPC xiFBKs5Tr9Sk4j16GlZvd8gmyJkRmiw4ihIu8WYI= From: "neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/110224] Rejects valid: function reference with data pointer result as lhs in assignment Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 16:36:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110224 --- Comment #9 from Neil Carlson --- > > (i) Have I got the lot? > I believe so. > (ii) Are there existing PRs for the two most recent? > I always try to report the bugs at the same time they go into my "database". The first is here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110033 But the second one I assumed was an opencoarrays problem; or at least I decided that was the place to start. My report is here: https://github.com/sourceryinstitute/OpenCoarrays/issues/748 But I never heard back from them -- the project has been effectively abandoned as far as I'm concerned -- and I had forgotten to follow up on it. However the problem may actually be on the gfortran side. You're welcome to enter a PR for it, or I can if you would prefer that. -Neil=