From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B82F73858D3C; Tue,  4 Jul 2023 15:11:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B82F73858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688483473;
	bh=odh0teylD/ODSAfLh/+VaJ45pZ3urlfsp5KH05LAb6o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ohf4TE60j1ahVVzaiZbjivQJ1Q7fXDhOu6xDBHTuUhB273tJGJeI3zzCnLuS/n2rI
	 fEvnisadq1EDeV1Kj29THX3xTfvLZqgoq2XYumBRkQzHAgOqykJjsz5QH5jxHmiDc6
	 dDXdB93qGDohQGq92UCVd/6t9N2V5M0xU/aXd+So=
From: "slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due
 to an maybe uninitialized variable
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 15:11:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110228-4-YNVLMtGZ6D@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110228

--- Comment #34 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #33)
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2023, slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110228
> >=20
> > --- Comment #32 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #29)
> > > I can't reproduce the original failure on trunk or with GCC 13.1, but=
 the
> > > testcase from comment#16 is now fixed.  I also cannot reproduce the t=
estcase
> > > from comment#21 before the fix.
> > >=20
> > > Can people double-check this is now fixed, maybe also on the branch w=
hen this
> > > fix is cherry-picked?
> >=20
> > Test suite on llvm-16 still fails the same single 'LLVM ::
> > ExecutionEngine/JITLink/X86/MachO_weak_references.s' test for me.=20
> >=20
> > gcc was built from 2c12ccf800fc7890925402d30a02f0fa9e2627cc.
>=20
> Can you try 819285ef10a87d663f8c181c06aa88d1d9f75aed - your small
> testcase looks OK now.

Ah, that commit fixes 'LLVM ::
ExecutionEngine/JITLink/X86/MachO_weak_references.s' and the rest of llvm-16
test suite for me. Thank you!=