public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized and optimizations saying that the uninitialized has a nonzero bits of 1. Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 21:38:57 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-110228-4-ewQs8hAcYs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-110228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110228 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[14 Regression] llvm-16 |[13/14 Regression] llvm-16 |miscompiled due to an maybe |miscompiled due to an maybe |uninitialized and |uninitialized and |optimizations saying that |optimizations saying that |the uninitialized has a |the uninitialized has a |nonzero bits of 1. |nonzero bits of 1. Target Milestone|14.0 |13.2 --- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- here is a (x86_64 as it requires the inline-asm to force an undefined value inside LookupFlags but LookupFlags is not used until the next iteration) program which we have been miscompiling -O2 since r13-4459-g6508d5e5a1a8: ``` unsigned a[4] = {1,1,1,1}; unsigned tt1 = 0; __attribute__((noipa)) static void bug(unsigned & p, unsigned *t, int n, int t2) { for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) { bool LookupFlags ; unsigned v = t[i]; unsigned tt = tt1; if (v == 0) LookupFlags = 0; else if (v == 1) LookupFlags = 1; if (LookupFlags) { tt|=3u; LookupFlags = 0; } asm("movq $-1, %q1":"+a"(LookupFlags)); p = tt; } } int main() { unsigned r = 42; bug(r,a, sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]), 1); __builtin_printf("%u\n", r); if (r != 3) __builtin_abort(); } ``` Yes it is a bit odd but that was the only way I could get the code added in r13-4459-g6508d5e5a1a8 to be invoked and even have LookupFlags|=v==1 happening and get what could get undefined behavior in the loop.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-17 21:38 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-06-12 17:19 [Bug middle-end/110228] New: [14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompilation on small case switch, minimized slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 17:27 ` [Bug middle-end/110228] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 17:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 17:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 17:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 17:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 19:03 ` [Bug middle-end/110228] [14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized and optimizations saying that the uninitialized has a nonzero bits of 1 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-12 19:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-15 4:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-16 22:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-16 22:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 17:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 20:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 20:56 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 21:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-17 21:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-06-20 8:38 ` [Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 " aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-24 0:01 ` [Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due to an maybe uninitialized variable pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-30 2:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-01 5:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-01 21:37 ` zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch 2023-07-01 21:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-01 21:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-03 21:04 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-03 21:52 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-04 6:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-04 6:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-04 9:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-04 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-04 10:06 ` zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch 2023-07-04 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-04 13:36 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-04 13:41 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-07-04 15:11 ` slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-05 7:29 ` [Bug middle-end/110228] [13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-05 8:23 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-05 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-110228-4-ewQs8hAcYs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).