From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 76B0A3858409; Tue,  4 Jul 2023 13:41:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 76B0A3858409
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688478082;
	bh=X7zlXBJdaDrnr2HB87ZxZ1dSUjIMGL3HjQRSzOi4m9E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eYpaiex1nYX6B5T/BxaASLEL4bllilsAs7iR7dvjkPxnc1ARGOgi5YJj2eQzhqwQH
	 hQCJiPrrlu4OHy6MQpdktVe9IRtB8fyfUf1i4ieF9uUsy35pcHlf/vFVAbiRGGAC+3
	 1WAcwoBRDv83AawHgaYR8Penb8WMl6r+KRUgVI8w=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110228] [13/14 Regression] llvm-16 miscompiled due
 to an maybe uninitialized variable
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 13:41:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110228-4-hoOltZIyUY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110228-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110228

--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023, slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110228
>=20
> --- Comment #32 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #29)
> > I can't reproduce the original failure on trunk or with GCC 13.1, but t=
he
> > testcase from comment#16 is now fixed.  I also cannot reproduce the tes=
tcase
> > from comment#21 before the fix.
> >=20
> > Can people double-check this is now fixed, maybe also on the branch whe=
n this
> > fix is cherry-picked?
>=20
> Test suite on llvm-16 still fails the same single 'LLVM ::
> ExecutionEngine/JITLink/X86/MachO_weak_references.s' test for me.=20
>=20
> gcc was built from 2c12ccf800fc7890925402d30a02f0fa9e2627cc.

Can you try 819285ef10a87d663f8c181c06aa88d1d9f75aed - your small
testcase looks OK now.=