From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 898593858D35; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:52:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 898593858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1687254753; bh=mHNunDc+9F1nkwmPrkaji2psaV9xd6sZrAIS9JSAHBY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PGvgLbRGnGq7gB9lOAEQp5BtxCOC9VBXpafA7oA+0JuiI+QHEHyA6Ev+A+rxxlso9 syJQPUm24O8e1DPwamvrnb32lVUp2lMLgqLaQxMll6tAIVGbx1DWra7LQRjRDVcOIR K0Q9D4z00DQ+BlCB/yVdHbKp4wbr2Wc5U8iHUtCI= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/110237] gcc.dg/torture/pr58955-2.c is miscompiled by RTL scheduling after reload Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 09:52:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status see_also everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110237 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110309 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2023-06-20 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- This looks like the same issue as PR110309. We have (insn 38 35 39 3 (set (mem:V16SI (plus:DI (reg:DI 40 r12 [orig:90 _22 ] [90= ]) (const:DI (plus:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("b") [flags 0x2] ) (const_int -4 [0xfffffffffffffffc])))) [1 MEM [(int *)vectp_b.12_28]+0 S64 A32]) (vec_merge:V16SI (reg:V16SI 20 xmm0 [118]) (mem:V16SI (plus:DI (reg:DI 40 r12 [orig:90 _22 ] [90])=20 (const:DI (plus:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("b") [flags 0x2]=20 ) (const_int -4 [0xfffffffffffffffc])))) [1 MEM [(int *)vectp_b.12_28]+0 S64 A32]) so instead of a masked load we see a vec_merge with a (mem:V16SI ...) based on the vectp_b.12_28 pointer that has full size but the load of b[1] we try disambiguate against refers to int b[10] which is too small for a load of 64 bytes so we disambiguate based on that. So quite likely a duplicate.=