From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7E3733858414; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:56:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7E3733858414
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1686743819;
	bh=91doj3ThbsiAgPhSjb4dxEcSHO9+xQtWfAHkygbplvg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RxKl5r1xbi7us1uoT2/L+qti24lrXo+b/X3uBa8tLK2uT8AOqpIosFchsXuN2k5zz
	 ruhDgsmRaMhD1LThzuhPr3+2aUEYjxOXapEy9jTbIBIGOe55qQ4F0Kv1NRuzjt0+Mq
	 mVUavRnVHz1pfo8YBCLv6ch6mKpB3FRRwG0tSX1Q=
From: "juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110248] ivopts could under-cost for some
 addressing modes on len_{load,store}
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:56:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110248-4-j3X5S0mM3i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110248-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110248-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110248

--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong <juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai> ---
You mean add a default argument =3D nullptr to targethook legitimate_addres=
s_p to
let powerPC do more middle-end address ivopts analysis?

If yes, I am ok with that. Let's see Richard and Richi more comments.

Thanks.=