From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DA54A3858D32; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 19:59:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DA54A3858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1702238353; bh=CUF/ea6PVP/hVTUSoBZlviqZmrexMLcG8hPd5PubIa8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eNh251c3/vYJRRdkf5IBc4IHGthZ9WjTxtcf5KYyCpT2Nx6KBHX3Oy/YqIDUg8B2P PvjdnUN2cwFJg+OL5z+szATUoiNLvA0A9vbYesV3bSpHpCNlbPUVVJ+puOH+OWBGUR X+aTKXeXh480NZ6kH12fcncQG2ebvFbjhsLsZcmk= From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110273] [12/13/14 Regression] i686-w64-mingw32 with -mavx512f generates AVX instructions without stack alignment Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 19:59:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110273 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- (In reply to Jens-Hanno Schwalm from comment #10) > Hi, i think we found a very-similar issue in darktable code, you might lo= ok > at >=20 > https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/15742 >=20 If you're hitting this on another target than i686-w64-mingw32, please file= a new bug. We can always mark it as a dupe if it turns out to be, although I suspect it isn't here.=