From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0287E3854E77; Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:47:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0287E3854E77 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1686908828; bh=4ZCfS7EtkWLBpv3XWjHugETLnU/oCN62iP77NWPJrYM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=d8weKNq4ivUKOIa7wqh1dMUbC4sJw1eMQS53zdZELqsd8Jc9WrECIw2d4YJJtPfXu 1E0rWPeucL20O6o6idvkQEzT0U8T4kDLofiPcsR6tEtui3EkFEQGgoT68j7C3LS7oq Zt6zOkbQHeELsEnTkYZ0HbPEecDJ8Lr1jXXhFU1s= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110278] [14 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr103257-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "link_error" 0 from r14-1880-g827e208fa64771 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:47:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110278 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- And x !=3D (typeof x)(x =3D=3D 0) is always true, the only other related on= e I could come up with. That's optimized for _Bool but not integer types.=