public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/110292] undefined value due to strict aliasing without warning
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2023 06:47:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110292-4-Ex25FQGrb4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110292-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110292

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Yann Droneaud from comment #5)
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks a lot for the quick analysis of my issue.
> 
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > Note -Wstrict-aliasing=1 actually does warn:
> 
> OK, and -Wall enables -Wstrict-aliasing which defaults to
> -Wstrict-aliasing=3,
> I'm sorry I haven't tried to use lower values ...

The problem is -Wstrict-aliasing=1 may produce many false positives, as it's
documented.

> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wstrict-
> aliasing
> 
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > aliasing violations are known not to be warned about nor have a runtime
> > sanitizer either.
> 
> Is there any other tool that would reliably detect such issues ?

Such issues are obviously impossible to be detected reliably at compile time
(because doing so will need to solve the halting problem).  At runtime LLVM
guys are developing a type sanitizer:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/reviving-typesanitizer-a-sanitizer-to-catch-type-based-aliasing-violations

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-17  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-16 20:55 [Bug c/110292] New: " yann at droneaud dot fr
2023-06-16 21:03 ` [Bug c/110292] " yann at droneaud dot fr
2023-06-16 21:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-16 21:27 ` [Bug middle-end/110292] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-16 21:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-17  5:46 ` yann at droneaud dot fr
2023-06-17  6:47 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110292-4-Ex25FQGrb4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).