From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 22E973858D39; Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:36:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 22E973858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687120563;
	bh=8stYhV6+IrlIbR8LOE9vTF8+nibavMtx2J7sWNNtIq0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GJDuGBMO5amOuCNf9QgMq81jErTpblC9a/Dr+r5SNJ7rlo2V9okkMM6gaW+QZuNuU
	 u3SNPCceJrK/2LiJEgvbo2NRDNbljAHfRqPi2L6bhYLhCM+U0PjPBy5nsiqn+GkPD4
	 6By6uEYJ2fvLD03GlRob1hysJ7E2c3iPJO0IvIKQ=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110301] [14 Regression] x264 regression on 
 Neoverse-N1
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 20:36:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110301-4-Ap3UvaigNP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110301-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110301-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110301

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
OR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=3Dgcc.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3D4e31e63ea7edffd1212fc17=
ce8d50672035bb64b

But I don;t think that would change anything here.=