From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1391D3858D37; Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:17:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1391D3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687450663;
	bh=wusqSkAMKRmwCEBrR4iXEBcD8Ex5N6vqNW8kiXuODF8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SUwepfBR9g4JKUHvBX6IFfHbabgINJar8QTB3O2rbIc6vNS6efE+PvgdpFULbcGEY
	 6gqzv0u7FSlrbqPpwZ/pEoohJXwQPzzNQPeq8d0PUlUT2RswjdP2bpJgUFo3f/G+/6
	 85MmI0ONfay76wg1r+08hn97xmdbbs4BO9pqxpf8=
From: "matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/110307] ICE in move_insn, at
 haifa-sched.cc:5473 when building Ruby on alpha with -fPIC -O2 (or
 -fpeephole2 -fschedule-insns2)
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 16:17:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110307-4-el9RC9Vev9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110307-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110307-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110307

--- Comment #11 from matoro <matoro_gcc_bugzilla at matoro dot tk> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #10)
> I think the first patch may result in duplicated notes, so I wouldn't
> recommend picking it.

Oh okay, so just the second patch then?  Let me try that.=