From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E033E3858C2A; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:46:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E033E3858C2A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687614409;
	bh=uIwF27a8yDkAX4qZvjFHqSyeJiFF5f++C+MlDrshFao=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BPjtWTuG0pJxgx8ul6YzssDfQIth6deSU3HLr9cv7UDvDrNXAy0/P/B0oUAfUv9b+
	 olzspXDTT6dz0NYotaa3Kjb1+GCShFJe8GmFP3/tm8U/2ajD1WvCZA6Db8YXZeKdtI
	 pwGTcgzxTOjLZrgoLhw06m6sn5DCUubdWs1apS2Q=
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110311] [14 Regression] regression in
 tree-optimizer
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 13:46:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110311-4-6Tjj5rixjV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110311-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110311

--- Comment #20 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If that doesn't help: there appear to be recent optimizations for divmod.
Try declaring a1, a2 as volatile.=