From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4F89C3858C60; Sat, 1 Jul 2023 08:09:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4F89C3858C60 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1688198981; bh=PoxzWdjdITCF2uO/ynrK2wUrg30LbPCjNQGJXFhEn3c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ShfT1beqlEFIq1yBOC6s8iAo8CnOsdlCnfYzI9tO7dO4KgmkN6ln+8IcVwQ4TWx41 A+H/lseB9r8qcZA2L/U+2YkUgu9jV9tXAXfLXMvkTk0ec9taeo3hOiXoRGT2GJLzJ2 2xXGsOFwZgD/blW4OXoj6d8adunfkfuC9BBLpDac= From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110311] [14 Regression] regression in tree-optimizer Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 08:09:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110311 --- Comment #44 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #43) > Mabye the fprem issue was a red herring from the beginning, pointing to a > problem in a different place. >=20 > I recompiled each module in a loop with -O0 until the FPE went away. >=20 > instances_sub.f90 seems the file someone wants to look at. >=20 > Works at -O0, -O1, -Os, -O2 -fno-tree-vectorize > Fails at -O2, -O3 >=20 > on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. >=20 > J=C3=BCrgen: can you reduce this even more with this information? Thanks, this info is helpful. So it is the setting up of the full process v= ia the instances module, which is in agreement with the fact that the simple t= est with only the RNG did not fail. I will be busy for several days, but hopefu= lly in a week from now, I'll know more.=