From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4A4613858D33; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:02:15 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4A4613858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1691571735; bh=COtPz6S0+PMl0He2a9/igdeHDfSAn5W/LwP4xckSCks=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Yk7gSmIBq3YDv95QeXGMy+JvXTMZfCUOkeCsLZXLmj6DWqqySBj0mEOkR8ZVCcBfF 5dhIC+815tfZgISgrKs2PLePl8iKFTMY8QePUrHyE2AJSrjtJTOPPlJ53lOR6MHkRs zKqbuvvEl7peq6ZjfchOy8hcw0wZm+IetaiW0Qcg= From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110311] [14 Regression] regression in tree-optimizer Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 09:02:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110311 --- Comment #50 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter --- How to proceed here? Since almost exactly a month the current gcc git master doesn't show this problem anymore, from our CI I can deduce that the versio= n on July 3rd still failed, while the version on July 10th worked again. Since t= hen the problem didn't show up again. My guess is that something has changed in= the optimizer again (maybe because of a different problem/regression). Is it wo= rth to find the offending commit and see when and how it was fixed (maybe even accidentally), or shall we add a gcc testsuite for regression testing, and close this issue?=