From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6CBA63858410; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:07:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6CBA63858410 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1697540873; bh=6LQfrIP/vBY8R1yEC2p55wyLqxAf8T7PFbEZ42OOreQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nlKyKicWyCqIuTITS8pZ3+q1bK8cuF6JPGGk55P0fGpZ8cwEfRkjeI4o/eM747dta sEkHh0rOa1hqPDq+XAJTCXnI65A7J+cQ+wkqCEL4nCvHCL8tPTAqiykQ0yf8zNKo8X TjsSomdRuCU9wFq6WIQar9DS/GmT6ZPnlHEpn5lw= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110311] [14 Regression] regression in tree-optimizer Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 11:07:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110311 --- Comment #57 from Richard Biener --- It might be not ideal but it seems unless somebody finds the time to analyze the difference the "fix" did and thereby identifies the problem itself clos= ing the bug is the most efficient way of dealing with it :/=