From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C269638555A0; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:14:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C269638555A0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695734044;
	bh=b4M//ZJOQu7s9OxeZVNnEkpgtfw70ASLAytpwMLQtoU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=on0O0hw2kxedFFlQ60flFdIAxRooHgmw1Bvvm2vnX+x6vfuPnJnjvp65eost1ULzj
	 tcWvhGs/LGwx6/q2cD4e6OvPZQ1ks00YFoV/VUyYo4C2Y/E8o8ueN5IZBNOaDRB0vC
	 gabiB39WgCuTLtcDi/JnmDUoTMPsOEP5TSdGht6s=
From: "amacleod at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110315] [13 Regression] g++ crashes with a
 segmentation fault while compiling a large const std::vector of std::string
 since r13-6566-ge0324e2629e25a90
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:14:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amacleod at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110315-4-YSMFormzUt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110315

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #7)
> > Created attachment 55591 [details]
> > potental patch
> >=20
> > I've attached Aldy's patch for PR109695 which he had backported to GCC13
> > back in May.
> > This does resolve the issue.. Assuming we want to apply it GCC13.  The
> > original variant has been in trunk for a while now.  Im running this th=
ru a
> > bootstrap/regression run now.
> >=20
> > I don't know if there is anything further you want to try it with?
>=20
> Can we consider this please?

sure. OK for gcc 13 after another round of regressions?=