From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 949A13858C2A; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:03:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 949A13858C2A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1695726188;
	bh=1G+6Yt7E0elvxWKUhcTtR1xDeIFbQkcUH9LWJ2OoJCI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Ixgsi5GpNmyCtLWfgAfXDRKqUt9poB5JU4wPCZsfdo6gzvRFwVmWQUT41RPtLqT4q
	 TGLqX4+/vvsOxxX0eOaESSBgtEzJ/lmj9h3dtgD3UlN1HIo6+oucElsi9JFD/rPH3k
	 diCeeAfxQGDArCTVdg5dx4NLbaRDu3ThetjmJ5bI=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110315] [13 Regression] g++ crashes with a
 segmentation fault while compiling a large const std::vector of std::string
 since r13-6566-ge0324e2629e25a90
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:03:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110315-4-pVtnDJN6yS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110315

--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #7)
> Created attachment 55591 [details]
> potental patch
>=20
> I've attached Aldy's patch for PR109695 which he had backported to GCC13
> back in May.
> This does resolve the issue.. Assuming we want to apply it GCC13.  The
> original variant has been in trunk for a while now.  Im running this thru=
 a
> bootstrap/regression run now.
>=20
> I don't know if there is anything further you want to try it with?

Can we consider this please?=