public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110315] [13 Regression] g++ crashes with a segmentation fault while compiling a large const std::vector of std::string since r13-6566-ge0324e2629e25a90
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 11:34:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-110315-4-zUkE4HH7ww@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-110315-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110315

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |amacleod at redhat dot com
           Priority|P3                          |P2
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-07-19
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.  Not sure whether it's possible to backport any of the stack usage
reduction in ranger from trunk or whether it's other recursion limiting that
avoids this there (besides different IL from the frontend ...).

Andrew/Aldy?  The call chain is 20000 frames deep when it faults on me
(with a -O0 built cc1plus running in gdb).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-19 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-19 23:34 [Bug c++/110315] New: " glebfm at altlinux dot org
2023-06-20  0:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/110315] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-19 11:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-07-19 14:06 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-07-19 18:12 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-07-19 18:55 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-07-19 19:29 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-07-20 15:07 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-07-27  9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-29  7:07 ` glebfm at altlinux dot org
2023-09-26 11:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-26 13:14 ` amacleod at redhat dot com
2023-09-26 18:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-26 18:06 ` amacleod at redhat dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-110315-4-zUkE4HH7ww@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).