From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 4CE593858421; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:40:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CE593858421 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1687268446; bh=ZCy4PcKifXyuwaRxpdBcJKSKaHjQl63zQUVtq95mmoM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=Soj64n2YJvZXRgPH0dYZfEqgudjulNpWs8M0Pz4Az0mRhgI1Fd0vaRO+BMb0T7pxT 3IytWC8Jnak9jzejnkEkqTr5Vlzaz0DNiC2DahkXpsyDL7BysyRpMhtO5OYU/E6tfp GqN/NyAUTjQ9AxT5bdK2aLDcORv8odT1lM7EHQ8E= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110320] New: ELFv2 pc-rel ABI extension allows using r2 as a volatile register Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:40:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110320 Bug ID: 110320 Summary: ELFv2 pc-rel ABI extension allows using r2 as a volatile register Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The PC-Relative ABI extension to the ELFv2 ABI defines register r2 (normally the TOC register in ELFv1 & ELFv2) as a volatile register available for use= in the register allocator. Currently GCC doesn't make use of that fact, so th= is is a missed-optimization opportunity.=