From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AB8403858D28; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:14:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AB8403858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1687295694; bh=vgA1USJWEWJFvqL/LTVKnyi/WjwVKJEidq/m5Cod8oU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=n+P7RdKw3x3dQ6c8D6aRaq8Te9yjseA+H59C8aUvl3kbqdsVjxmR7Fj4Mmen7feYY U1mjM9OKeluHAsnlDYlG3XpTwZJUOFWmq92pNkJtZ6+YtW4p/FP5ZVVLNdbWzaAcEU FIk2lNoSxte8kK1yqUb1wOpUowbJ9YcvroiVvwUA= From: "seurer at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/110329] New: [14 regression] build fails building documentation after r14-1949-g957ae904065917 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:14:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110329 Bug ID: 110329 Summary: [14 regression] build fails building documentation after r14-1949-g957ae904065917 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: seurer at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- g:957ae90406591739b68e95ad49a0232faeb74217, r14-1949-g957ae904065917=20 I am only seeing this failure on an older power 7 machine. Is something ou= t of date on it or maybe the patch is using some "new" feature? make[2]: Entering directory `/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc' if [ xinfo =3D xinfo ]; then \ makeinfo --split-size=3D5000000 --split-size=3D5000000 --no= -split -I . -I /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc \ -I /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/include -o doc/gccint.info /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc/gccint.texi; \ fi /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//md.texi:840: Unknown command `backslashchar'. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//md.texi:840: Misplaced {. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//md.texi:840: Misplaced }. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//tm.texi:6446: warning: unlikely character [ in @var. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//tm.texi:6446: warning: unlikely character ] in @var. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//tm.texi:6446: warning: unlikely character [ in @var. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//tm.texi:6446: warning: unlikely character ] in @var. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//tm.texi:6446: warning: unlikely character [ in @var. /home/seurer/gcc/git/gcc-test/gcc/doc//tm.texi:6446: warning: unlikely character ] in @var. makeinfo: Removing output file `doc/gccint.info' due to errors; use --force= to preserve. make[2]: *** [doc/gccint.info] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test/gcc' make[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/seurer/gcc/git/build/gcc-test' make: *** [all] Error 2 ESC[33mcommit 957ae90406591739b68e95ad49a0232faeb74217ESC[m Author: Tamar Christina Date: Mon Jun 19 15:47:46 2023 +0100 New compact syntax for insn and insn_split in Machine Descriptions.=