From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 29DF03858C5E; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:36:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 29DF03858C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1687300610; bh=tPMhhBj6Np/+Ag28d6PsS2Wc5USNs3J86XMu8DnPFyY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y62vUkO6tqAsktqJFgvAr/TkHoP0580QF27wG6NqWIVgLIQUNQpdKCKZzhANU/of+ dttmnr/VKDXKlqLFGwdn9fWGQjYwN5YS9p3GUPhfL624Y5JO5kiRpNufCgrcJNODWX WyuSlmlP6cucI4t2jgFjgXjxnYR/1wm/CwmQUEm4= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/110330] GCC does not diagnose ambiguous function introduced from base class Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:36:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110330 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |82894 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think this is a dup of bug 82894. Specifically see bug 82894 comment #2 . Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D82894 [Bug 82894] [10/11/12/13/14 Regression] Inherited member functions do not create ambiguity=