From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BCC2D3858D35; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:35:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BCC2D3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688027751;
	bh=a6cBqx8a1rMADqfZ8e4/6Ay2D0729vYjP4DOhzwY2iI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Pstq1B6mHoJHyQWsZywA0EZuBFqMz2zRNORYLf2XVUNmHXWt7anNPC8TceKnEGCEt
	 sBzrNdOWXzIUUFMAsRAUYKHYjAz49LoeWiDKwYs1Mzo10xelzhvFsAWui6ccMYLqwh
	 uNlX9eEliNyZ0ycsXeeNcOx3mPRZVqOFoFFpV0v8=
From: "guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110331] ppc64 vec_extract with constant index is
 suboptimal on P8
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:35:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110331-4-t5vMoGthrz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110331-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110331-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110331

--- Comment #1 from HaoChen Gui <guihaoc at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Even the P9 assembly is not good, as vextu* has a higher lantency than mfvs=
rd.=20
        li 9,12
        vextubrx 3,9,2=