From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6DB36385841F; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 07:05:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6DB36385841F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689145526;
	bh=AIJsvuOTG+fdrlnnIb5ZCdlE+zNeZIoSzaWWUs4uaA0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tYGO59A3wpuO9xVpG/j+mLvTPAZS0cluCrEIq5N0ohlyCgHIAD+xuaD7R5gB/wT3W
	 mFloZ1C5vgqCKU0FOd3WeB/apoI5IP6dZzBKnx+H7b4bJfyLyBtVtrmQrPqhNZlOF2
	 qASQz7NTpjO8jnaCwn0j/sYVjWwA+JwKWQ2JPHAQ=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/110334] [13/14 Regresssion] unused functions not eliminated
 before LTO streaming
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 07:05:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110334-4-FEVfwneD7R@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110334

--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Tue, 11 Jul 2023, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110334
>=20
> --- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> ---
> But it would be nice to see why the functions are not early inlined.

Note this was on the 13 branch with the C++ fix backported, so
before your changes to allow to inline into always-inline.  But yes,
it would be nice to confirm the issue is gone on trunk and to see
where always_inline is still missing (if it is).=