public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/110334] [13/14 Regresssion] unused functions not eliminated before LTO streaming Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 12:02:15 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-110334-4-abE9rPhTOO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-110334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110334 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- So the CTOR we call is built (well, cloned from that) via implicitly_declare_fn (kind=sfk_inheriting_constructor, type=<record_type 0x7ffff3423e70 Vec>, const_p=false, pattern_fn=<function_decl 0x7ffff3427600 __ct >, inherited_parms=<tree_list 0x7ffff34298c0>) at /space/rguenther/src/gcc11queue/gcc/cp/method.cc:3245 and 'pattern_fn' has the always_inline attribute here but we don't seem to copy that anywhere? -fno-new-inheriting-ctors also "fixes" the optimization issue for me. So do we fail to copy DECL_ATTRIBUTES for these kind of implicitely declared functions (which are in fact explicitely declared?!)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-22 12:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-06-21 7:05 [Bug ipa/110334] New: " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 7:06 ` [Bug ipa/110334] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 7:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-21 7:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 11:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 11:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-22 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-06-23 10:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-23 11:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-23 12:59 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-23 13:07 ` Jan Hubicka 2023-06-23 13:07 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-26 6:39 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-06-26 17:50 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-27 6:41 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-06-28 10:00 ` Jan Hubicka 2023-06-28 4:42 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-28 10:00 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-28 10:20 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-06-28 10:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-06-28 21:06 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-03 7:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-10 7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-10 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-10 8:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-11 14:45 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-07-11 14:46 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2023-07-12 7:05 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2023-07-27 9:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-25 10:00 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-11-27 7:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-21 9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-110334-4-abE9rPhTOO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).