From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BA0AF3858D35; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 19:48:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA0AF3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687981735;
	bh=3g4yc02u/5Er85MpGTMN4EpUoD08t/8UHJ6jk/k6jq8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=El9cfSoLypSfEjcsu1DrHAZFugL1pPwNzEY3kb1x+r4LDJv5Q0Fj2DobMr90JXyNE
	 ysRt2jyA7h263UM6SBkU9zdHEEiU4TvfUVq/YgZu1yP+sz10DXIUfOyp4Kj8ifQcMN
	 N/5FunKVOlngrJNPnq/3RJF0py6UO5aSMFgpaogA=
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/110360] ABI issue with character,value dummy argument
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 19:48:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110360-4-hJ0ZSMh8tS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110360-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110360

--- Comment #23 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #22)
> Created attachment 55418 [details]
> Slighty revised version of 3rd patch
>=20
> I've looked at gfc_conv_string_parameter, which I was not aware of.
> This can be used for a more readable patch.
>=20
Looks good.

> It appears one could even use the revised part for constant arguments, to=
o.
> However, this changes the tree-dump for gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_13.f03
> slightly in two places, implying the need for an adjustment of the patter=
n.
> As I am not entirely sure whether the result of that change is correct,
> I refrained from using that version.
>=20
OK, let's play it safe.

> (The partial output from Power BE appears to suggest that constant argume=
nt
> is still right.)
>=20
> Mikael: do you want to test on Power, or shall I proceed?

Sorry, still can't login at the moment.
Reading the account creation message again, I may need to wait "a few days".
So please proceed.=