From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 84E12385781F; Fri,  6 Oct 2023 15:51:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 84E12385781F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1696607492;
	bh=sqp8SuMLFC8LJSbgO+xnoCUc/KqrZkWT9IsZPlt9sYY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=oH1I5J5EdS+pDBOp0/IOv0XP9mAOdbcQ8xzjZWRZv3MWJGQO4UMNkyA2t8nzYtirr
	 IxOKKdRadCnSwexVA0iwK4R9kbOV8rb0Xb5bKx/qMdQZ3rnAJV0dfFEm5Hk1Aj9MUQ
	 1iSSEaHMVKBFrlEQngc6GdGDRVEqTiuOL3pyOuW0=
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/110368] Incorrect "is used uninitialized" warning message
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 15:51:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110368-4-qnc4yiucXa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110368-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110368

--- Comment #7 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That said, I suppose we should do better here with -Wstrict-aliasing. No le=
vel
detects it.=