From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 69F993858408; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:37:51 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 69F993858408 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1687772271; bh=+4Y4wU6bFAQfyEnDlqnCGR26joWOku+442wgJblDdKE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JyXQPDHmYrzHQoNnEs9085uP5ix1f8iz2OX0n4Kr22L0FSdAQXGCEaZnFaD527XI3 E5omY3Un5YrXfsYtjZbufPyUF+B+yZ2c01IJbm5ltUwAiNoD++zMnwvNWZhEGkMQl6 tjYBhIJdtwPOvVRCHJc9edOc4Cc6dvUyiqtn4mZg= From: "ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/110406] d: Wrong code-gen returning POD structs by value Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:37:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110406 --- Comment #8 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > > Which itself is GCC 12+ regression too ... >=20 > I filed that as PR 110407, let's see what the x86 backend folks say ... OK, in the meantime I will proceed with seeing what I did to change the ret= urn behaviour on my end. So long as C and D agree with each other when it comes to POD types, it alm= ost doesn't matter to me weather the back-end is following the wrong ABI.=