From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D2E203858D1E; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:38:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D2E203858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687772327;
	bh=BIrf96ijarq+LVH1+/BCughbE5+9kv+ya5/tJf4FHJ4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=R0OxXCuhWzDbqJ0WTB5zL9s/6Q2gWW+oZ9FuIGYnQSn04fxbE3khh8vqd8bZp+Ylv
	 F5/vzhvb6JRMDFJpGLzX9pYa4I0iarv43X7rjPXAxLtRBY8XVc4c+eGkT9DbiTRGcI
	 edTjHcy9ZEj64oqAGSbD/KpD/ze/e3WWkj0vcwQk=
From: "ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110406] d: Wrong code-gen returning POD structs by value
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 09:38:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ABI
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110406-4-qXhmKK0JWV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110406-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110406-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110406

--- Comment #9 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #8)
> So long as C and D agree with each other when it comes to POD types, it
> almost doesn't matter to me weather the back-end is following the wrong A=
BI.
Or whether.=