From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7C5733858C00; Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:21:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7C5733858C00
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687800064;
	bh=K0Vkmu4BTpVu199yWD+jaNJpPphFjqIGT7m7eKLKPKc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tqIeIUPdTMg3D7ZvCxBvfYN5gN9OHsLb82h8YTU6m9m9kN5zBXgcznk1VQteoQO+n
	 yuXV15gz9BUPpDkB2FMIvqz/p2Ox971Nn56RQ6dRID/92kg79kFmtwkUXEL/upNM51
	 r1Tf1eJBQXCvwyGZYdHbqJXyXhs9XV2b7T/QaqPM=
From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/110415] (Re)allocation on assignment to allocatable
 polymorphic variable from allocatable polymorphic function result
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 17:21:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-110415-4-QfEW6wo4YU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110415-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110415-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110415

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-06-26
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed.

Thanks, Brad.  I vaguely recall a similar bug report, perhaps, PR107489.

Here's the code in question

type, abstract :: p
end type

type, extends(p) :: c
end type

class(p), allocatable :: a

a =3D func()
contains
  function func() result(a)
    class(p), allocatable :: a

    a =3D c()
  end function
end=