public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/110416] New: Error initializing of const union variable with a mutable field
@ 2023-06-26 17:14 fchelnokov at gmail dot com
2023-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const aggregate " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: fchelnokov at gmail dot com @ 2023-06-26 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110416
Bug ID: 110416
Summary: Error initializing of const union variable with a
mutable field
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: fchelnokov at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
This program
union U {
mutable int x;
float y = 2;
};
int main() {
const U u;
u.x = 1;
}
is accepted in Clang and MSVC, but GCC complains:
<source>: In function 'int main()':
<source>:7:13: error: uninitialized 'const u' [-fpermissive]
7 | const U u;
| ^
<source>:1:7: note: 'const union U' has no user-provided default constructor
1 | union U {
| ^
<source>:2:17: note: and the implicitly-defined constructor does not initialize
'int U::x'
2 | mutable int x;
Online demo: https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/T8bqYTG5f
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const aggregate variable with a mutable field
2023-06-26 17:14 [Bug c++/110416] New: Error initializing of const union variable with a mutable field fchelnokov at gmail dot com
@ 2023-06-26 20:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 20:23 ` [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const union " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 20:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-26 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110416
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Error initializing of const |Error initializing of const
|union variable with a |aggregate variable with a
|mutable field |mutable field
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
struct also fails ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const union variable with a mutable field
2023-06-26 17:14 [Bug c++/110416] New: Error initializing of const union variable with a mutable field fchelnokov at gmail dot com
2023-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const aggregate " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-06-26 20:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 20:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-26 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110416
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|Error initializing of const |Error initializing of const
|aggregate variable with a |union variable with a
|mutable field |mutable field
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2023-06-26
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> struct also fails ...
Well clang does not reject that case but MSVC does.
So I don't think the struct case is a GCC bug; just clang does not have a
check.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const union variable with a mutable field
2023-06-26 17:14 [Bug c++/110416] New: Error initializing of const union variable with a mutable field fchelnokov at gmail dot com
2023-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const aggregate " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 20:23 ` [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const union " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-06-26 20:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-06-26 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110416
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
[dcl.init.general]/8 (specifically 8.2) is what makes the union case valid.
Though I wonder what mutable field means in an union if not the whole union is
not mutable ...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-26 20:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-26 17:14 [Bug c++/110416] New: Error initializing of const union variable with a mutable field fchelnokov at gmail dot com
2023-06-26 20:19 ` [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const aggregate " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 20:23 ` [Bug c++/110416] Error initializing of const union " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-26 20:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).