From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 559343858D32; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:35:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 559343858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687912529;
	bh=iz6CYwBbOLNihCtuSYIj9zyZJODV/KOJLVkIM2RxMGk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pLpM0XVK2MckfypAHQlEWdvD7bAwzkE6YkqwggN29ZMI5bjLV8HGfpATnWrckXIhz
	 kBv/26TMGOtpdyG9KgjhCf6xALqYNkWFQJS1T3uB+zTqQnqyRTv2h5EwmVuu6/ltvL
	 eH5o6ZAch9SOwP6/c2WI6zIJJVENd4azR78zzd0o=
From: "crazylht at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/110438] generating all-ones zmm needs dep-breaking pxor
 before ternlog
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:35:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: crazylht at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-110438-4-hbgjCpeF3q@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110438-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110438

Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |crazylht at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu <crazylht at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> We might want to omit PXOR when optimizing for size.

indeed.=