From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 150DB3858D39; Wed, 28 Jun 2023 20:38:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 150DB3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1687984681;
	bh=0bjnWkX/nEZMgvGN/Lp5mwFBiH/jC53mh8/TQLy+694=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ykDLw7yieYrq9i4s8egIvaTJI3FmGxeMgo+rWopTYfsIh41K1rYHhSeZPrMF8gb9S
	 wXmNtkGcfhKzLaLFVBTPdHJ8y6C5Zqno+ePUxqKXQ+0MLS/bgqBOaGv+DaM3WJ08cj
	 OpOKMWdl2ddgSOr5oFqBI8e8W9u94tubWgmnAw7A=
From: "gococobu at 7art dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110468] internal compiler error in nothrow_spec_p (g++ >
 11)
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 20:38:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gococobu at 7art dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110468-4-UfP10FcXri@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110468-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110468-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110468

--- Comment #5 from gococobu at 7art dot org ---
(by the code being correct I mean in terms of standards, best practices, et=
c...
it definitely does compile in gcc++ 10.2 and 11.0)=