From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C7C8E3858D37; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:04:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C7C8E3858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1688025885; bh=ZQmFKFedRAdk7v1zr7ypQs9yJxsBW6lpEQrQ8BTQr2E=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WGhaQgha9+6HbrRwr1HZzGuIm1R4XxE88hWla+OvScptC+uywpVOcDzn4m/pUILCo pzMEC3phgSA/C1BRjOh9yxfEMoQYxsBqKcBTKAvxT4yV8A3PaRT6vW8euxpfHWYDc8 QbfM3ztMXUWJIiey97OkeyD5KQhY8O3C2Zq61oPE= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/110477] -fexcess-precision=standard not applied consistently Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:04:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110477 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Well "any ordinary programmer would be baffled." There is a lot of counter intuitive parts of c and c++ and just happens to be one of them . *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108742 ***=