From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5A1F93858D35; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:32:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5A1F93858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688027573;
	bh=D8ziPq8RVVgZzxqhiiyWtnPt57fNwF+FGuqZ1+Ksl4s=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XUTEXs9gurqFcnzvSFLoKPISdMh0Pqfo6ZOBvT1QYiZicCNlNlqgMhjhCPWyQQ2au
	 vGIBa/I7Uvlfa1oK9t6z79CCFnP58jsOAo51jr3ICEdZNX+/UusmttvVhyt5Xa8l4g
	 HHv2FsjzSea9jwyovKxPqDsRdIWWSk0Oy0C/TfOQ=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110477] -fexcess-precision=standard not applied
 consistently
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:32:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110477-4-iuA2qKpbcu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110477-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110477-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110477

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> double f =3D 2.1;
> assert( f =3D=3D 2.1 ); // fails

Which is effectively the same as your example from PR 110476.=