public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/110477] -fexcess-precision=standard not applied consistently Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 08:31:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-110477-4-uwWXmmWFgA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-110477-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110477 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Peter Dimov from comment #1) > Looks like a duplicate of > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108742 and is fixed by casting > the rhs to (float), Yes, with -fexcess-precision=standard removal of excess precision only occurs when assigning to an lvalue or with an explicit cast, not for the equality comparison. An even simpler version is: double f = 2.1; assert( f == 2.1 ); // fails The value f has no excess precision bits, but the literal 2.1 is evaluated as an 80-bit float. The comparison promotes f to the type of the rhs, but it's lost its excess precision, so we're effectively doing (double)2.1L == 2.1L and that's false. > but any ordinary programmer would be baffled. Yes, very much so. (In reply to Peter Dimov from comment #3) > That's true, but the normal expectation of anyone using > -fexcess-precision=standard would be for it to apply consistently everywhere > (that is, as if FLT_EVAL_METHOD is 0.) > > Of course given that FLT_EVAL_METHOD is in a header, so unaffected by -f > options, it's not clear what can be done here. I think the rationale is that without -fexcess-precision=standard we do not correctly respect FLT_EVAL_METHOD, so its value doesn't matter. With -fexcess-precision=standard we do respect it ... with confusing consequences. The solution is to kill i387 ;-) -m32 -mfpmath=sse gives more sensible results.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-29 8:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-06-29 7:28 [Bug c++/110477] New: " pdimov at gmail dot com 2023-06-29 8:00 ` [Bug c++/110477] " pdimov at gmail dot com 2023-06-29 8:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-29 8:10 ` pdimov at gmail dot com 2023-06-29 8:31 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-06-29 8:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-29 8:44 ` pdimov at gmail dot com 2023-06-29 9:07 ` mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-29 11:00 ` pdimov at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-110477-4-uwWXmmWFgA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).