From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 845F03858C98; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:08:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 845F03858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1709222899;
	bh=hmL5FCbcn1djNKnJnnIJ9zBE+b1GDAx2FNWJuz7bsBg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IIbFX7kkN/Daqn3nw+zOJ4HLbHunbMqEdJ5ltjDbBxZiJ6HklEIFmW4rb2Juc6oI+
	 9Gv2Xx49wN3MPYlLldmXDIJu0b8064lVZUIeBHkQHIauPeQoRFaJHIymMaNz7Re/z0
	 Vct6iF5iPZOvnb+rj95k16L91Fllc6/WTGa5YVyc=
From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/110483] [14 Regression] Several
 gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-*.c tests FAIL
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:08:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-110483-4-UI6yeXKtm4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110483

--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks; let's keep using this PR for the stuff in comment #5.

I've been looking at these on gcc211 in the compile farm:
  * I see out-of-bounds-diagram-11.c failing as you describe (the overflow =
in
test6 isn't reported with g++ for some reason; it is for gcc)
  * out-of-bounds-diagram-3.c gets skipped on that machine due to=20
    { dg-require-effective-target lp64 }
    "check_cached_effective_target lp64: returning 0 for unix"

Is there a config/cfarm machine you see the out-of-bounds-diagram-3.c failu=
re
on?=