public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug analyzer/110483] Several gcc.dg/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-*.c tests FAIL Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 12:59:07 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-110483-4-lVAI7RBU9i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-110483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110483 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Thanks for filing this; sorry about the failures. > > What's the endianness of the hosts that this is happening on? Solaris/SPARC and AIX are both big endian, while avr and pru are little endian. As I said, without full access to the logs its hard to tell if the failure is always the same. > Is there a machine in the GCC compile farm that this happens on? There are gcc (Solaris 11.4/SPARC) and gcc211 (Solaris 11.3/SPARC, so you'd need to configure with --enable-obsolete), as well as gcc111 (AIX 7.1.1) and gcc119 (AIX 7.2.2). However, I've run my Solaris builds on local machines. > so presumably an issue with: > > fmt_styled_string (sm, "[%li]", > byte_idx.ulow ())); > on those hosts. > > Possibly an endianness-handling mistake by me? It certainly smells like that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-30 12:59 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-06-29 11:09 [Bug analyzer/110483] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-29 11:10 ` [Bug analyzer/110483] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-29 20:22 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-30 12:59 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE [this message] 2024-02-27 22:19 ` [Bug analyzer/110483] [14 Regression] " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-27 22:29 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-29 10:30 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-29 16:08 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-29 20:37 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2024-05-07 7:40 ` [Bug analyzer/110483] [14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-110483-4-lVAI7RBU9i@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).