From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 47572385828D; Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:33:42 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 47572385828D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688052822;
	bh=0NR2vqNe8qYEP2R6tY63vQetxeDdkjJs0g5V5u/pbgg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UJzyK12XdkJlYKl/k9VGnhtr8VkmNPuq4PYFu7VLmJGrBR4c+hCLuFrfhLZHiavzL
	 hyq7Lr4+vJUYlDUDhYe/W0A+7G6JKewZBPuPWbgSzbqsy/PEBCcnt7yCDIuCjKavuG
	 zNxPSPJowiXlLDIwGTw4OI6lLhz0ZSxS30fjfqTA=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/110484] Spec2017 541 after adding the
 '-flto-fomit-frame-pointer' optimization, after optimizing the rnreg,
 directly replaced other registers with the $r22 register, so that the value
 of the $r22 register was destroyed without being saved.
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:33:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-110484-4-K2k7y8Ft8r@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110484-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110484

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, I don't quite get the problem.  r22 is a saved register, so if it's
clobbered w/o being saved, the issue will be a wrong-code, instead of a
missed-optimization?=