From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7BDD33858D33; Sat,  1 Jul 2023 02:49:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7BDD33858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1688179797;
	bh=U+y4DHHAY2F6j7ATm7EvntYU1QySLYcXq1jDqIohRYk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cQ+gQGzzA+x1e9Sq7G6YHM426oGJz24Tp+UvHWr5cLx3H0y4hbhxFeiS0KpbeSKzY
	 p3VjXVbPFMzS4jsBxckiRhl79cZli3oecYQVlL/PcPtSD8GAKFM83Zwhc34Tlx4jDV
	 QfmBE1iNElDKUCnSUvE9vXgtoOLJ9D9wMR2ijx3E=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/110487] [12/13/14 Regression] invalid wide
 Boolean value
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 02:49:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-110487-4-FpXZ6uTFc9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-110487-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-110487-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D110487

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #55441|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55443
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D55443&action=3Dedit
Patch for the original issue updated

This updated the patch for the original issue slightly by using type rather
than TREE_TYPE (@12) as they will be the same but type is shorter and will =
be
slightly faster (at compile time).=